2025:JHHC:23013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.3513 of 2025 ---- Samir Saha, son of Nakuleshwar Saha, aged about 63 years, resident of 18 A Creek Row, Entally, Circus Avenue, Kolkata, P.O. & P.S. Circus Avenue, District Kolkata, West Bengal. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State of Jharkhand, through Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District Dhanbad. 2. Sub Divisional Officer-cum-Rent Controller, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District Dhanbad, 3. Suresh Chandra Chourasia, son of Late Durga Prasad Chourasia. 4. Smt. Sharda Devi Arora, wife of Sri Subhash Arora. 5. Smt. Roshni Arora, wife of Mukesh Arora. Respondent nos. 3 to 5 are residents of Kabrasthan Road, Joraphatak Road, Shakti Nagar, P.O. Dhanbad, P.S. Dhansar, District Dhanbad. …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohitashya Roy, Adv. Mr. Vibhor Mayank, Adv. Mr. Roshan Kr. Singh, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : A.C. to A.G. ---- 04/Dated: 11th August, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following relief:- “(a) In the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 09.04.2025 (Annexure-7) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad in H.R.C. Appeal No. 01/2023 whereby and whereunder the learned Deputy Commissioner-cum-Appellate Authority under the Jharkhand Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 2011 has been pleased to dismiss the appeal and affirm the order dated 16.06.2023 passed by the House Rent Controller in H.R.C. Case No. 06/2016; For issuance of any other appropriate writ(s) or direction(s) or order(s) as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in view of the facts & circumstances of the case for doing conscionable justice to the Petitioners;” 2025:JHHC:23013 Page | 2 W.P. (C) No.3513 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that an alternate remedy, by way of revision, is available to the petitioner, rendering the present writ petition not maintainable at this stage. 3. In view of the above submission, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to avail the alternate remedy of revision, as may be available under law. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded