HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5402 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that by the lapse of time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 7, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Jyoti And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench