CRL OP(MD). No.19581 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/11/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.19581 of 2025 Senthilkumaran, S/o.Muthaiya ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Aralvaimozhi Police Station, Kanniyakumari District. (Crime No.509 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.509 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.19581 of 2025 The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.509 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant was proceeding in his two wheeler at Chenbagaramanputhoor-Seethapal road near market area, at that time, the petitioner and other accused persons were following the defacto complainant on a motorbike, waylaid him and threatened him showing knife and robbed 3 sovereigns gold chain from him. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.19581 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner is having 17 previous cases and he is a history sheeter and the property was not revocered. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner is having 17 previous cases and he is a history sheeter and in the present case, the charge against the petitioner is he has committed robbery and the property were not recovered, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 07.11.2025 PJL To 1.The Inspector of Police, Aralvaimozhi Police Station, Kanniyakumari District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.19581 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY,J PJL ORDER IN CRL OP(MD). No.19581 of 2025 07.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis