SANDIP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11739/2025 · 2025-12-05
Pankaj Bhatia
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11739 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.83 of 2024, under sections 363, 366, 376 IPC, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Jaitpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant was enticed by applicant. Subsequently in her statement the victim did not support the prosecution story and stated that both of them had gone to Haryana and is staying as husband and wife. The victim refused to undergo medical examination. The tentative age of the victim is around 17 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the two statements did not support the prosecution story, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 16.8.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Sandip be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with one surety of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandip .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 5, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11739 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench