2025:JHHC:11317 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4385 of 2024 ----- 1.Prakash Paswan @ Prakash Hazra, S/o Chhatru Paswan 2.Dugan Paswan @ Dugan Kumar Paswan, S/o Madhu Paswan 3.Pradeep Hazra, S/o Kedar Hajra 4.Kamu Paswan @ Kamu Hazra, S/o Kishun Paswan All petitioners R/o Vill- Dumarbaki, P.O. Machhli & P.S. Bhelwaghati, Dist- Giridih .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Ray Karan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P. …...... 06 / 15.04.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This anticipatory bail application under Sections 438 and 440 of the Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379 and 34 of IPC. There is an allegation that this petitioner and others entered the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and others indiscriminately. There are three persons, who were injured and injuries are on the vital part. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid allegation, I find that this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners in connection with Bhelwaghati P.S. Case No.17 of 2020, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class at Giridih stands rejected. (ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./