HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3816 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashish Raman Mishra, the learned counsel for the appellant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. After taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in various pronouncements related to recall of witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C. rendered in the case(s) of Mohd. Khalid Versus State of West Bengal (2002) 7 SCC 334, Hanuman Prasad (Supra), Natasha Singh vs. CBI, (2013) 5 SCC 741 : (2013) 4 SCC (Cri) 828 : 2013 SCC OnLine SC 444, State of Haryana vs. Ram Mehar and others; (2016) 8 SCC 762, Swapan Kumar Chatterjee vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2019) 14 SCC 328; Varsha Garg vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others; 2022 SCC OnLine SC 986 and as also by this Court in Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 274 of 2022 (Ram Nayak Singh vs. State of U.P. & Another), on being confronted, the learned counsel for the appellant says that he does not want to press the instant appeal and it may accordingly be dismissed as not pressed. 3. The aforesaid has not been opposed. 4. In view of the above, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed. November 26, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ashish Raman Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Ajjam @ Nasrooddin .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench