HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10755 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on several occasions. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents is present. 3. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the matter is consigned to record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. 6. In the event, the petitioner is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. November 25, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : J.B. Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Shyama Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench