Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185239 (ALL)

NAND KISHOR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14674/2025 · 2025-12-17

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14674 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.K.Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite parties no. 1,2 & 4, Sri Jitanshu Tripathi, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Anil K.Tripathi, ,learned counsel for the opposirte party no. 3 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the Respondent no.3 i.e. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Gonda to consider and decide the grievance as post retiral dues of the petitioner i.e. Gratuity Amount, Group Insurance, Leave Encashment, Bonus, ACP-1st, 2nd & 3rd and arrear of pension for 15 months etc. alongwith at the rate of interest 18%, which is pending before him within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court;" After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Gonda and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anil Kumar Tripathi Nand Kishor .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/ Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Gonda within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 17, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14674 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench