SIRAJ AHMAD v. CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) DISTT. AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND 5 OTHERS
A227/6968/2025 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185230 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185230 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6968 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Sri B.Q. Siddiqui, the learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset has stated that he does not want to press the instant petition and he would file an appropriate application before the learned trial court for ensuring service of notices/summons on the defendants expeditiously and for expeditious disposal of temporary injunction application. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid. December 1, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bajhul Quamar Siddiqui, Mohammad Saqib Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Siraj Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge (Senior Division) Distt. Ambedkar Nagar And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench