SATISH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.THR.PRIN.SECY.NAGRIYE ROZGAR GARIBI UNMOLANandORS
WRIA/1005/2020 · 2025-12-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185220 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185220 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1005 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Chandra, Akhilesh Kumar Kalra, Jyotiresh Pandey, Narendra Shanker Shukla, Pooja Singh, Sachin Garg, Shreya Chaudhary, Sukumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gaurav Mehrotra, S.S.Rajawat, Sri Asit Srivastava (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Satish Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thr.Prin.Secy.Nagriye Rozgar Garibi Unmolanandors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench