Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185219 (MAD)

Karthick Raja v. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP(MD)/17115/2025 · 2025-10-14

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 14/10/2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 Karthick Raja ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,, Kenikarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.275/2021). 2. Thenila, D/o. Arunachalam ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime No.275 of 2021, dated 15.04.2021 by the 1st respondent police and quash the same as against the petitioner. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Rameshkumar, For R1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.S.Prabhu 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.275 of 2021 on the file of the first respondent Police, which was registered for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC. 2. The allegation in the FIR is that on account of prior enmity, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, attacked her and threatened with dire consequences and thus, committed the aforesaid offences. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the defacto complainant/the second respondent would submit that the petitioner and the defacto complainant had a love affair; that there was a quarrel between them; that a complaint was lodged and that the parties have now entered into a compromise on the advise of the elders and well- wishers and both the parties have agreed that the impugned F.I.R may be quashed. 4.The parties have also filed a joint compromise memo dated 22.09.2025. The scanned copy of the compromise memo reads as follows: 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 5.The petitioner, namely, Karthick Raja (Aadhaar No.6316 1578 5575) and the second respondent, namely, Thenila (Aadhaar No.7819 6401 5007) are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.Senthilkumar, Sub Inspector of Police, Kenikarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them. 6.Considering the nature of the offences and the fact that the parties have arrived at a compromise, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned FIR pending investigation. Accordingly, the impugned FIR in Crime No.275 of 2021, on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. 14.10.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No cp 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 To 1. The Inspector of Police,, Kenikarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.17115 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN,J CP ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17115 of 2025 Date : 14/10/2025 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis