Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185216 (ALL)

SUFIYAAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/8493/2025 · 2025-11-19

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8493 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Rejoinder affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate-I for the State and perused the records. 3. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.393 of 2025, under Sections 8/20/21/29/22/60 NDPS Act, registered at Police Station- Thakurganj, District- Lucknow. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that the co- accused Neha Nishad and Meena Devi have already been granted bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court by means of orders dated 08.08.2025 and 16.10.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.7410 of 2025 and 10091 of 2025 respectively. Photocopies of the bail orders are annexed as Annexure No.1 & 2 to the supplementary affidavit filed today. 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation but he does not dispute this fact that the co-accused, having identical role have already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 14.07.2025 and two co-accused persons have been granted bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anuj Verma, Abhishek Singh, D.K. Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sufiyaan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Sufiyaan be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. . (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) November 19, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 8493 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench