NATTHA RAM v. STATE OF U.P THRU SECY SECONDARY EDU LKO and ORS
WRIA/10001/2017 · 2025-10-29
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185215 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185215 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10001 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 29, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Singh Atal, Rishabh Kapoor Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Nattha Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru Secy Secondary Edu Lko And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench