MOHAMMAD NOOR UL AIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/10642/2025 · 2025-12-11
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185213 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185213 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10642 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. The petitioner is permitted to implead the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Kaiserganj, District - Bahraich, as an opposite party during course of the day.
3. By way of a letter dated 24.10.2025, the petitioner had sought for a permission of a sanctioned plan for construction of a property over a piece of land, which was owned by the petitioner, in which there was an old house existing. The old house has been brought down by the petitioner and the construction of the new building is sought, as per the sanctioned plan, prayed for.
4. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Kaiserganj, District - Bahraich is directed to decide on the sanctioned plan within a period of three weeks from date.
5. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. December 11, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Mohammad Noor Ul Ain .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench