HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 828 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 11, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Chandra Agarwal, Pankaj Kumar, Sunder Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Lalit Kumar Shukla, Shanker Lal (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Shailendra Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Dairy Development Lucknow And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench