Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18520 (KAR)

SRI SATHEESH KUMAR GOPPANNA v. SMT MUNIPOOJAMMA

WP/26376/2018 · 2025-03-25

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12559 WP No. 26376 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.26376 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SATHEESH KUMAR GOPPANNA S/O E GOPANNA E., AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SAMWAY SUPER MARKET, AL-JUBAIL, KINGDOM OF SAUDHI ARABIA. 2. SMT. S. SUMATHI W/O. SATHEESH KUMAR GOPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.46, KAMARAJAJ STREET, WALAJAH, WALAJAPET-632 513 VELLORE DISTRICT, TAMILNADU. REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI JANARDHAN PRABHU K.S. S/O E. KODANDARAMAN, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, NO.382, 10TH 'D' CROSS, JAKKUR LAYOUT, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 060. …PETITIONERS [PETITIONERS (ABSENT)] Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12559 WP No. 26376 of 2018 AND: 1. SMT. MUNIPOOJAMMA W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, 2. SRI M. NARAYANA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 3. SRI M. VENKATESH S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 4. SRI M. DAYANANDA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 5. SMT. M. NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5 ARE R/AT NO.150, GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL ROAD, JAKKUR, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 060. 6. SMT. SHOBHA THENGLE W/O GANAPATHI THENGLE, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, NO.319/A, 7TH CROSS, JAKKUR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 064 7. SRI N. MANJUNATH S/O N. NAGARAJ, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12559 WP No. 26376 of 2018 AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.41/1C, IST MAIN ROAD, PALACE GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 003. 8. SRI G.V. GIRISH S/O DR. GOPAL GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 9. SMT. BHARATHI N.H. W/O SRI G.V. GIRISH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.8 AND 9 ARE R/AT NO.5, BALAJI KRUPA, IST FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, ANNAYYAPPA BLOCK, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI P.M. NARAYANASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R.1 TO R.4; R.5: SERVED; R.6 & R.7: NOTICE DISPENSED WITH VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 13.08.2018; R.8 & R.9: NOTICE HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 13.08.2018.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 17.02.2017 PASSED ON I.A.V UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 9 OF CPC., BY THE LVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN O.S.NO.1581/2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, ETC. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:12559 WP No. 26376 of 2018 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioners even when the matter is called out for the second time today. The writ petition is of the year 2018. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35