Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1852 (AP)

N.Thimmareddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/34461/2025 · 2026-05-07

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010668532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 34461/2025 Between: 1. N.THIMMAREDDY, S/O N.PEDDHA ROSANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O HOUSE.NO.2-60A,P RUDRAVARAM VILLAGE AND POST, GARGEYAPURAM,KUMOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. K VENKATESWARLU, S/O NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O ASHOK NAGAR, KURNOOL. 6. K VENKATESWARLU, S/O VENKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O ASHOK NAGAR, KURNOOL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more 2 particularly one In the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the Respondents No.3 and 4 in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject lands being an extent of Ac.2.49 cents in Sy.No.333/2B, an extent of Ac.0.19 cents in Sy.No.343, an extent of Ac.01.05 cents in Sy.No.344, an extent of Ac.2.35 cents in Sy.No.333/2B and an extent of Ac.01.38 cents in Sy.No.344 situated at Rudravaram Village, Kurnool Mandal (Rural) Kurnool District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the respondents no.3 and 4 not to Interfere in the above said subject lands and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents No.3 and 4 not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject lands being an extent of Ac.2.49 cents in Sy.No.333/2B, an extent of Ac.0.19 cents in Sy.No.343, an extent of Ac.01.05 cents in Sy.No.344, an extent of Ac.2.35 cents in Sy.No.333^B and an extent of Ac.01.38 cents in Sy.No.344 situated at Rudravaram Village, Kurnool Mandal(Rural) Kurnool District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 08.05.2026 NNN