Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185189 (ALL)

RAM PRAKASH YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS

/13751/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13751 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Nidhi Singh, learned counsel for opposite party Nos.2 & 3. 2. Notice on behalf of opposite party No.1 has been received in the office of Deputy Solicitor General of India. 3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for payment of interest on delayed payment of Privilege Leave Encashment. 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e., Additional General Manager/ Unit Head (R.B.), ITI Limited, Doorbhash Nagar, Raebareli - 229010 who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 28, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Nidhi Singh (Manish Mathur,J.) Ram Prakash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench