MOHAMMAD MERAJ @ MOHAMMAD MIRAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/11497/2025 · 2025-11-27
Pankaj Bhatia
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185174 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185174 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11497 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 189 of 2025, under sections 70(2), 333 BNS, Sections 5/6 POCSO Act, Section 67A IT Act, P.S. Jagatpur, District Raebareli.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Salman Ahmad was enlarged on bail vide order dated 11.11.2025 although there was no allegations of rape against him and the specific allegations of rape has been levelled against the applicant. However the medial examination was refused and in terms of statement under Section 180 BNSS it is clear that there is property dispute in between the parties. Thus false prosecution cannot be ruled out.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 2.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Mohammad Meraj be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Meraj @ Mohammad Miraj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 27, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11497 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench