Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185160 (ALL)

ARUNENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. CHETRAM AND 7 OTHERS

A227/6964/2025 · 2025-12-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6964 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri P.C. Chauhan, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ajeet Kumar, the learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite parties no.6 to 8 and filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Keeping in view the reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the remaining opposite parties is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Court No.20, Barabanki to expeditiously decide application under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 CPC pending in Regular Suit No.425 of 2024: Arunendra Pratap Singh and another Vs. Chet Ram and others. 4. The learned counsel for the opposite parties no.6 to 8 states that the opposite parties have filed objections against the application and those should be taken into consideration while deciding the application which is fixed for 09.12.2025. He stated that he has no objection against the application being decided expeditiously. 5. When a Civil Judge does not find a good ground for passing an ex-parte order of temporary injunction and issues notices on the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Chandra Chauhan, Arvind Kumar, Ravindra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arunendra Pratap Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Chetram And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) application, it is necessary to prevent the ends of justice that immediately after appearance of the parties the application for temporary injunction should decided expeditiously without any delay. 6. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of and a direction is issued to learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Court No.20, Barabanki to decide application under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 CPC pending in Regular Suit No.425 of 2024: Arunendra Pratap Singh and another Vs. Chet Ram and others expeditiously in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, preferably on the next date fixed i.e. 09.12.2025. December 1, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 6964 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench