Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010195512009 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/133/2009 FANI BHUSAN DEY and ANR S/O LATE JAMINI MOHAN ROY. 2: SMTI. PAMPI DEY D/O SHRI FANI BHUSAN DEY BOTH ARE RESIDING AT SUBHAS ROAD WARD NO. 16 KARIMGANJ TOWN P.O. and DIST. KARIMGANJ VERSUS JAYANTA PRASAD CHOUDHURY and ANR, S/O LATE GURU PRASAD CHOUDHURY, R/O SUBHAS NAGAR, KARIMGANJ TOWN, P.O. , P.S. and DIST. KARIMGANJ, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT POLYTECHNIC CAMPUR, MEHERPUR, SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR. 2:MUKUL BHATTACHARJEE S/O LATE MAHESH CHANDRA BHATTACHARJEE RESIDING AT SUBHAS ROAD WARD NO. 16 KARIMGANJ TOWN P.O. and DIST. KARIMGANJ For the appellant (s) : Mr. K. A. Mazumder, Advocate For the respondent (s) : None appears Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 19.05.2025 This Court has duly taken note of the affidavit filed by Mr. K. A. Mazumder, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants wherein it is duly stated that the appellant No.1 had expired and no steps have been taken by the appellant. He further submits that the appellant No.1 prior to his death had also taken back the records. 2. This Court has duly taken note of that on 22.04.2015, it was informed that the appellant No.1 had expired. However, no steps have been taken. 3. The appellant No.2 has also not engaged any person after the file had been taken. It therefore appears that the appellants are not interested to proceed with the instant Appeal for which the instant Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant