HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10045 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard, Shri Santosh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and Shri Chetan Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has made a statement at bar that the investigation has already been concluded, and a charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners acknowledges the said facts. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 20, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Chetan Kumar Tiwari (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Malik Suheb .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench