KISHORE KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/1045/2025 · 2025-12-09
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185138 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185138 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1045 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
2. The applicant has approached this Court for the following main reliefs:
"1. Issue an order or direction to the Hon'ble Court of Additional Court No. 12, Lucknow for expeditiously completing the trial of the preferred Case No.83502/2022 under section 190(1)(a) read with section 138 N.I. Act on day-to-day basis which is pending for adjudication for more than 3 years in the Hon'ble Court of Additional Court No. 12, Lucknow.
2. Issue an order or direction to the Hon'ble Court of Additional Court No. 12, Lucknow for expeditiously deciding the application for interim compensation under section 143-A of the negotiable Instrument Act in the pursuance of the Case No.83502/200 which is being pending for adjudication since more than a year before the Hon'ble Court of Additional Court No. 12, Lucknow."
3. The aforesaid case of the applicant is pending since the year 2022. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that under Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act, it is provided that every trial under this Section shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint. He has submitted that since long time, the case is pending Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahmood Alam, Akil Imam, Mayank Dwivedi, Shifali Rajput, Syed Saad Anwar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kishore Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
without substantial progress.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed to adhere to the provisions of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act and accordingly expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to the parties.
5. This application stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 Sachin A483 No. 1045 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench