RENU KORI @ RENU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/10067/2025 · 2025-12-05
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185136 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185136 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10067 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):-
"WHEREFORE, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire criminal proceedings of Case Crime No. 88/2020, under section 504, 506, 427 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow, pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow, as well as the charge sheet dated 22.03.2020 and summoning order dated 25.09.2020 may kindly be decided in terms of compromise, between the complainant/opposite party no.2 and the petitioner they have entered into compromise and they have settled their dispute outside the court as such, they do not want to contest the case further. It is further prayed that the dispute is of personal nature and does not affect the society, as such, the case be decided on the basis of Compromise, in the interest of justice."
4. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 5 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajeet Kumar Singh, Vishal Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Renu Kori @ Renu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned court within four week's from today.
(ii) If the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. December 5, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 10067 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench