Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18513 (GAU)

KIRAN KUMAR DAS v. THE UNION OF INDIA and 5 ORS.

WP(C)/2656/2017 · 2025-06-02

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010195912017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2656/2017 KIRAN KUMAR DAS ROLL NO.5105062346, S/O LATE SUSHIL KUMAR DAS, R/O-VILL- KETEKIBARI, PO-SOBHOG, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781317 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and 5 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-110001 2:THE STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION SSC REP BY THE CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION BLOCK-12 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110003 3:THE REGIONAL DIRECTRO NER STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION PO-RUKMINI NAGAR SACHIVALAYA GUWAHATI-06 ASSAM. 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE CGO COMPLEX NEW DELHI-110003 5:JAYANTA KUMAR ROY Page No.# 2/3 ROLL NO. 5105016724 6:MANORANJAN NATH ROLL NO. 5105084707 COPY OF THE WRIT PETITION TO BE SERVED TO THE PRIVATE RESPONDENT NO. 5 AND 6 THROUGH THE RESPONDENT NO.4 I.E. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE CGO COMPLEX NEW DELHI-11000 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRU SARMA, MR.H BEZBARUAH,MR.R MAZUMDAR,MS.R DUTTA,MS U DAS Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., C.G.C.,MR. D C BORAH(R- 1-4) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 03-06-2025 Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that in the selection process, the writ petitioner did not score the qualifying marks on merit and, hence, the grievance expressed in this writ petition no longer survives for adjudication by this Court. On such ground, Mr. Mazumdar submits that this writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, be closed. Mr. D.C. Bora, learned CGC is present on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. In view of the above submission made by the petitioner’s counsel, this writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant