Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Rasalu Ram vs. Baldev Singh and others
Civil Revision No.68 of 2025
30.04.2026 Present: Mr.Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with
Mr.Atharv Sharma, Advocate for the
petitioner/applicant.
CMP No.9193 of 2026
By way of present application, the applicants/petitioners have prayed for restoration of the revision petition.
This Court vide order dated 7.04.2026 had granted a week’s time to take steps for the service of respondents No.3, 6 and 7 and in case the steps are not taken, the petition stood dismissed for non-prosecution.
The applicants/petitioners have stated that there is delay in filing the correct addresses of the unserved respondents, which is not intentional and had happended on account of the fact that their addresses could not be found.
Keeping in view the fact that the applicants/petitioners are ready to serve the unserved respondents through dasti, the application is allowed and the revision petition is restored to its original number and position. The application stands disposed of.
Civil Revision No.68 of 2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to take steps for the service of respondents No.3, 6 and 7 during the course of the day. In case steps are taken during the course of the day, dasti notices be handed over to learned counsel for the petitioners latest by 4th May, 2026, returnable for 28th May, 2026.
April 30, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj )
(naveen)
Judge