VETUKURU SREENIVASULU REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/33448/2025 · 2026-05-05
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1851 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1851 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010639002025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 33448 OF 2025 Between:
1. VETUKURU SREENIVASULU REDDY, S/O PAKEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION AND BUSINESS, R/O.DODLAVAGU, H/O.LINGALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE ,ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, MADANAPALLE MANDAL,ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICTT. 6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, MADANAPALLE ,ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 7. AKULA NIRMALAMMA, W/O. LATE. ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.THAUDUVARI STREET, NEAR RAMALAYAM,
C.T.M VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE MANDAL,ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus (a) Declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 6 in treating the land to extent of Ac.3.76 cents situated in Sy.No.552-2 of Bandakammakamma Palle (B.K.Palle) Revenue Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District erstwhile Chittoor District as Assigned Land under Section 22A(1)(a) and refusing registration of the sale deed forwarded by the executing court, as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India, and contrary to settled judicial rulings b) Direct the 2nd Respondent to delete/de-notify the said land from the rohibitory list maintained under Section 22A(1)(a) of the Registration Act, 1908, and also change the classification in all the Revenue records and communicate the same to the 6th Respondent (c) Direct the 6th Respondent to register the draft sale deed forwarded by the II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle, in O.E.P. No.48 of 2023 in execution of the decree in O.S. No.42 of 2021 and further also permit lawful registrations and mutations in favour of the petitioner AND (d) Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 6th Respondent to register the draft sale deed forwarded by the II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle, in O.E.P. No.48 of 2023 in execution of the decree in O.S. No.42 of 2021 in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.3.76 cents situated in Sy.No.552-2 of Bandakammakamma Palle (B.K.Palle) Revenue Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District erstwhile Chittoor District (pending on the file of the court of the II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle, Chittoor District presented by the petitioner through the execution court and release the same in favour of the petitioned pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3
The Court made the following order:
Heard Ms. T.Jyothi, learned counsel appearing for Sri Md.Saleem, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is against the action of the respondents in keeping the subject land of an extent of Ac.3.76 cents in Sy.No.552-2 of Bandakammakamma Palle (B.K.Palle) Revenue Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District erstwhile Chittoor District as Assigned Land under Section 22(A)(1)(a) of the Registration Act, 1908, consequently, sought for a direction to delete the said land from the prohibitory list and to communicate the same to the 6th respondent. 3. It is contended that the subject land initially belonged to an Ex- serviceman, Sri Akula Siddappa, who was granted an assignment of the land in 1959. In terms of G.O.Ms.No.279, Revenue (Assignment-I) Department, dated 04.07.2016, after the lapse of 10 years, Ex-servicemen were allowed to sell the said assigned lands. The petitioner, further placing reliance on the proceedings of the Collector dated 03.05.2023 and the Circular issued by the CCLA dated 04.05.2022, contends that the lands assigned in favour of Ex- servicemen after the lapse of 10 years can no longer be considered assigned lands. As the subject land was assigned 60 years ago, placing it under the prohibitory category is contrary to the GOs and Circular Memos issued in this regard. 4
4. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has placed before the Court a copy of the remarks received from the 4th respondent dated 05.12.2025. A perusal of the same would reflect that the land in Sy.No.552/2 over an extent of Ac.3.76 cents was originally assigned to Ex-serviceman Sri Akula Siddappa vide proceedings dated 30.06.1959 under the Ex-serviceman quota. Later, the survey number was subdivided as:
1. Sy.No.552/7 Ac.3.40 cents
2. Sy.No.552/8A Ac.0.15 cents
3. Sy.No.552/8C Ac.0.20 cents
4. Sy.No.552/8B Ac.0.15 cents
5. The District Collector, Annamayya District issued proceedings dated 03.05.2023, deleting the land from the prohibited category under Section 22(A)(1)(a) of the Registration Act, 1908 and it is further stated that there is no objection for the registration of the draft sale deed. 6. The said written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 05.12.2025 are placed on record. 7.
Having regard to the contentions advanced, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the 2nd respondent-The Disrtrict Collector, to communicate the order of deletion of the property from the prohibited category under Section 22(A)(1)(a) of the Registration Act, 1908 to respondent Nos.5 and 6, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of
5
receipt of a copy of this order. Upon submission of the said proceedings, the 6th respondent is directed to register the draft sale deed forwarded by the II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle, in O.E.P.No.48 of 2023 in execution of the decree in O.S.No.42 of 2021. 8. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 06.05.2026 BSK
6
27 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33448 OF 2025
Date: 06.05.2026 BSK