RUQUAIYA BEGUM v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LUCKNOW
WRIA/576/2002 · 2025-12-03
Amitabh Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185096 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185096 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 576 of 2002 Court No. - 25 HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the respondents are present.
4. The matter is quite old and it pertains to the year 2002.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 3, 2025 Ashish Dewal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ruhi Siddiqui, Anju Tripathi, Ashutosh Tiwari, Gaurav Mehrotra, Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, Shailesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mahesh Chandra, Ratnesh Chandra (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) Ruquaiya Begum .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Through Secy. Transport Deptt. Lucknow .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench