Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185083 (ALL)

SURAJ PAL YADAV @ SURAJ PAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/10446/2025 · 2025-12-10

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10446 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Tauseef Ali Ansari and Shri Karan Gupta, Advocates on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 19.09.2013 as well as summoning order dated 21.12.2013 passed in Case No. 774 of 2017, arising out of Case Crime No. 223 of 2013, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow and its entire proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them dated 17.11.2025 (Original copy of the same is appended as Annexure No. 4 to the application). 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the court below itself. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Faizal Hashmi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suraj Pal Yadav @ Suraj Pal And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of with direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notice to all its signatories requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of four weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicants. 8. Registry is directed to hand over the original copy of the compromise to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining photocopy of the same. December 10, 2025 VKS A482 No. 10446 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench