Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185079 (ALL)

MAMREJ @ MITHILESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 4 OTHERS

/11575/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11575 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.225 of 2025, under Section 65(1) BNS & Section 3/4(2) of POCSO Act, P.S. Sursa, District Hardoi. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that daughter of the informant aged about 14 years had gone out of home to the corn fields where the applicant caught hold of her and committed wrong on her. Subsequently, in her statement under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that fields were groundnut fields, however, allegations of wrong were levelled. Similar statement was given under Section 183 BNSS. Medical on record did not corroborate any allegation. 4. In the light of the said, learned counsel for the applicant states that on 20.08.2025, the applicant had given an application for compensation as the pigs of the informant had entered into the agricultural fields and had caused substantial damages and, thus, as a sequel to the same, FIR in question was lodged. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that the medical on record does not corroborate the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla, Abhinav Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mamrej @ Mithilesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) allegations, the applicant who is in custody since 23.08.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Mamrej @ Mithilesh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 11575 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench