VISHAL SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
/11575/2025 · 2025-12-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11575 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Sri Vineet Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, at the outset, has submitted that the petition has become infructuous in as much as subsequent to filing of the petition the impugned order has already been recalled and, therefore, the grievance of the petitioner no longer subsists.
2. In light of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner at the Bar, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. December 4, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vineet Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Vishal Singh And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench