ARUN KUMAR SHUKLA AND 9 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/10736/2017 · 2025-10-31
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10736 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 31, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Pandey, Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Arun Kumar Shukla And 9 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench