HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10473 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. In the present case, provisional and final assessment was carried out by the authorities. It is evident that notice of the same was provided to the petitioner. 3. In light of the same, we are of the view that the petitioner should challenge the same under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 4. In the event, the petitioner files the appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 within a period of two weeks from date and upon payment of the pre-deposit, the balance of the recovery shall remain stayed till the decision in the appeal is taken by the authority concerned. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 17, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shahid Salam, Mohammad Shamim, Mohd. Kashif Rafi, Saad Mohd Aslam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Mohd Faisal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Deptt. Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench