HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9562 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri B.P. Dwivedi, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner is the tenure holder of land situated at gata no. 771 area 0.6800 hectare, Majahuwa, Pargana and Tehsil - Tulsipur, District Balrampur and had given an application U/S 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for demarcation. On the application of the petitioner, a report was called for by the Revenue Inspector and opportunity of hearing was given to the respondents therein but no objections were filed and accordingly the report of the Revenue Inspector was affirmed by order dated 31.05.2022. 3. It has been submitted that the order dated 31.05.2022 was complied with and the stones were fixed but it is alleged that respondent No. 5 has destroyed the stones and again on the application of the petitioner stone fixing work was completed on 29.08.2022. 4. It is stated that despite the aforesaid, respondent No. 5 again destroyed the fixed stones. It has further been stated that respondent No. 5 is working in the police department and has considerable influence over the revenue authorities. 5. Accordingly, in the aforesaid circumstances, a prayer has been made to direct State-respondents to again fix the stones as per the order dated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Babban Prasad Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sukh Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 31.05.2022. 6. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand has submitted that specific statutory provisions exists as per Section 22 and 23 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and accordingly the petitioner can give an application to the concerned authorities who shall proceed to consider and decide the same with expedition. 7. Learned counsel for petitioner also submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner moved U/S 22 and 23 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 8. In light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner move an appropriate application within next two weeks and in case the same moved, respondents are directed to consider and decide the same within a period of four weeks thereafter in accordance with law. October 29, 2025 Ravi/ WRIC No. 9562 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench