Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18504 (AP)

SHAIK SHAFIULLA BASHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13646/2025 · 2025-06-15

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY. THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13646 OF 2025 Between: Shaik ShafiuHa Basha, S/o. late. Shaik Mohammed Haneef, aged about 64 years, Occ. Business. R/o. D.No. 11/712, Habeebulla Street, Kadapa City and District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. The Circle Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. Shaik P.S. Masthan, , S/o. Shaik Peer Saheb aged about 54 years,Occ Business, Shaik Babu, S/o. Shaik P.S. Masthan, aged about 52 years,Occ. Business, Shaik Shafiulla, S/o. Shaik P.S. Masthan, aged about48 years,Occ. Business, 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Shaik Khadeerulla, S/o Shaik P.S. Masthan, aged about 44 years,Occ. Business, ( Respondent Nos. 5 to 8 are R/o D.No.11/418, M.M. Street, Kadapa Kada District.) ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus to declare the failure and inaction of Respondents 2 to 4 in not registering any FIR or taking action on the written complaint dated.20.02.2025 and 24.02.2025 submitted by the petitioner and further providing necessary police protection to the life and liberty and to the property of the petitioner and further preventing any further illegal interference, harassment, or damage by Respondents 5 to 8 or any other persons acting at their behest and also taking action as per the law and procedure as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the procedure contemplated BNSS as illegal, arbitrary. Violation of Article 14 of Constitution of India. under lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to register FIR as well as to take action on the written complaint dated.20.02.2025 & petitioner by duly providing necessary police protection to the life and to the property of the petitioner & harassment or damage by Respondents 5 to 8 at their behest as per the law and procedure forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition. 24.02.2025 of the and liberty preventing illegal interference. or any other persons acting .AM Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010256222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13646/2025 Between: Shaik Shafiulla Basha ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the petitioner's representations dated 20.02.2025 and 24.02.2025. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the petitioner’s representations dated 20.02.2025 and 24.02.2025 will be considered by the 4*'' respondent, as per law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the 4*^ respondent to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 20.02.2025 and 24.02.2025, in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023. 2. 3. 4. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 4. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 5. One CC to Sri. MD Saleem Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED: 16/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.13646 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS