NAGENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. GOVT. CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/147/2024 · 2025-12-16
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185039 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185039 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 147 of 2024 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Consigned to record. December 16, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Nagendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench