BANWARI SON OF SHRI ROOPA RAM v. STATE OF OF RAJASTHAN
HC/140/2025 · 2025-05-08
Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 140/2025 Banwari Son Of Shri Roopa Ram, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Mundawara, Police Station Narayanpur, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. Superintendent Of Police, Kotputli-Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan)
4. S.h.o. Police Station, Pragpura, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan)
5. Madan Son Of Shri Sukhram Gurjar, Resident Of Madhogarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Jamasi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 08/05/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length is not pressing the petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law including pursuing missing persons report.
2. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
(2 of 2) [HC-140/2025]
3. There is no doubt in the eventuality of petitioner availing the remedies, the same would be considered in accordance with law expeditiously.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Anu /64