Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185022 (ALL)

SHIV BALAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. FINANCE GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/13532/2025 · 2025-11-21

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13532 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders and seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in relevant Government Order dated 08.12.2008. 3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner(s) is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025. 4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner(s) of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others). November 21, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhoopal Singh, Surya Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shiv Balak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Finance Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench