KAPIL DEV AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT.,LKO.
A227/7071/2025 · 2025-12-11
Alok Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7071 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the Consolidation Officer III Bahraich to decide the C. Case No. 202554001546031576 under/R 109 of the U.P.C.H. Act 'Lorik and others Versus State of U.P.' filed by the petitioners as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition expeditiously within the time specified by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case Consolidation Officer III Bahraich considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, Consolidation Officer III Bahraich is directed to make all endeavor to decide the C. Case No. 202554001546031576 under/R 109 of the U.P.C.H. Act 'Lorik and others Versus State of U.P.' filed by the petitioners, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Afzal Hasan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kapil Dev And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt.,Lko. .....Respondent(s)
concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. . December 11, 2025 Muk A227 No. 7071 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench