HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10363 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated September 22, 2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Sultanpur should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Sultanpur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Mishra, Antriksh Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Achhaibar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) parties. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 10, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10363 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench