APHC010256112017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1303/2017 Between: 1. NARTHU SHESHAGIRI, SRIKAKULAM DT & ANR.,, S/O. KESAVARAO, AGED ABOUT 49YRS, R/O G.KARAPADU VILLAGE, KAVITI MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. NARTHU MANMADHARAO, S/O LOKANADHAM, AGED ABOUT 53YRS, R/O G.KARAPADU VILLAGE, KAVITI MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and the State of A.P. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this memorandum of grounds of Crl.Rc. against the judgment dated 27-1-2017 passed in Crl.MP.No. 118/2015 in CC.No. 119/2013 on the file of the J.F.C.M. at Ichapuram, Srikakulam District. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2109 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in 2 C.C.No.119/2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at lchapuram, Srikakulam District , pending disposal of the above CrI.R.C. and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1303/2017 ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 27.01.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.118 of 2015 in C.C.No.119 of 2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Ichapuram. 2. Heard. Perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 11.09.2025 SCH 4 26 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:1303 OF 2017 Dated: 11.09.2025 SCH 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:1303 OF 2017 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 05. 11.09.2025 TMR, J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TMR, J SCH