Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184947 (ALL)

SURAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/11578/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11578 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.518 of 2025, under Section 70(2) of BNS and Section 5(g)/ 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Maurawa, District Unnao. 3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled that the daughter of the informant was going to the market when the applicant enticed her and set her on motorcycle and thereafter wrong was committed. Somewhat similar statement was given under Sections 180 and 183 of BNS. The victim refused to undergo medical examination. 4. The Counsel for the applicant argues that the same victim and the informant had lodged five FIRs of similar nature. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 6. Considering the fact that the victim has refused to undergo medical examination and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 08.09.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A Suraj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Let the applicant Suraj be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 11578 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench