ANKIT TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/10652/2025 · 2025-11-13
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184946 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184946 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10652 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard.
2. Under challenge is the notice dated 17.10.2025 issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mahrajganj, Raebareli, under Sections 129(G) and 130 of the BNSS, 2023, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he intends to submit his reply to the notice and prays that the competent authority be directed to consider the said reply in accordance with law and relevant rules.
4. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit his reply to the aforesaid notice within a period of two weeks from today along with certified copy of this order.
5. In case reply is submitted by the petitioner the competent authority shall consider the said reply in accordance with law and rules by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the reply.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. November 13, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Pandey, Animesh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Ankit Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench