Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184937 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR AND 31 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. BASIC EDU.GOVT.OF U.P. and ORS.

WRIA/20076/2016 · 2025-12-09

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 20076 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 3 are present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jyoti Sikka, Neeraj Chaurasiya, Pradeep Kumar Singh Bisen (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Amit Kumar And 31 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Basic Edu.Govt.Of U.P. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench