PUSHPA GAUTAM @ PAYAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/10420/2025 · 2025-11-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10420 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.369 of 2025, under Section 103(1) BNS ( Section 302 IPC), 3(5) BNS (34 IPC), Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow. 4. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the informant was the owner of the hotel and on 22.07.2025, the co-accused came to the hotel in which the girl who was staying in hotel because of which the applicant and the deceased had an altercation. Subsequently, the co-accused left the place and thereafter came on the motorcycle with girl and with an intention to kill the deceased fired upon him which subsequently resulted in his death. The applicant is the female who was accompanying with the co-accused on motorcycle. No allegation was levelled against the applicant of either causing the fire arm injury or exhortation. The applicant is a lady and is in custody since 22.07.2025 and is aged about 21 years. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 6. Considering the fact that no role was assigned to the applicant of having caused fire arm injury or any other allegation has been levelled against her, as such the applicant has no criminal antecedent, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Pushpa Gautam alias Payal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Kumar Rai, Ajai Kumar, Sachin Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pushpa Gautam @ Payal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 Renu/- BAIL No. 10420 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench