Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184915 (ALL)

SMT. SUMAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

/1005/2025 · 2025-11-28

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1005 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been forwarded against the petitioners and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 28, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Pal Singh, Anurag Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Smt. Suman And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench