Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184912 (ALL)

PRABHAT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEV. DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12636/2025 · 2025-10-29

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12636 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondent Corporation and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Present petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:- "(a) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Opp. parties to process the medical claim made by the petitioner for the sum of Rs. 4,93,608.41 in accordance with law and in the light of judgment rendered in the case of Mohd. Aslam Vs. State of U.P. and others expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (c) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Opp. parties to pay the interest on the delayed payment of medical claim at the rate of 12% per annum from the due date till the actual date of payment." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the medical claim of the petitioner is still pending before respondent no.3 and the same has not been paid as yet. She submits that the interest of justice would be subserved, if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to direct the respondent no.3/Secretary (Administration), U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), 6-Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow to take a decision on payment of medical claim of the petitioner within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the submissions Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Kapoor Prabhat Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Dev. Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the respondent no. 3/Secretary (Administration), U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), 6-Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of two month from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of with consent of the parties at the admission stage. October 29, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 12636 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench