HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 559 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and charge sheet has been forwarded against the petitioners, as such, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA for the State could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous leaving it open to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 24, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Singh, Krishna Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Nisha Srivastava (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Rudra Prasad Tripathi And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench