Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1849 (PNJ)

39 WEST RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION v. VISHESH SARANGAL IAS

COCP/3664/2025 · 2026-02-05

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 103 39 West Ranjit Goy Vishesh S Area Deve Nagar, Mo CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding order dated of this Co Welfare A respondent the legal no take an a COCP-3664-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3664 o Date of decision est Residents Welfare Associatio jit Goyal Versus esh Sarangal, IAS, Chief Admini Development Authority, PUDA B r, Mohali AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Ms. Diksha Rathi, Advocate fo Ms. Prabhjot Kaur Virk, Advo for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petiti eedings be initiated against the respon r dated 21.4.2025 (Annexure P-1) pass is Court in CWP-10693-2025 titled are Association vs. State of Punj ndent No.3 (competent authority) wa al notice dated 27.12.2024 (Annexur n appropriate action thereon, i 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3664 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-05.02.2026 ciation through its President …..Petitioner dministrator, Greater Mohali DA Bhawan, Sector 62, SAS …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA cate for , Advocate i, AAG Punjab. petitioner submits that contempt respondent for not complying the ) passed by a co-ordinate Bench titled as “39 West Residents Punjab and others”, whereby ty) was directed “….to look into exure P-7) of the petitioner and n, in accordance with law, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.05 17.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document preferably copy/produ submits tha been comp passing a S of the said rendered in February 0 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-3664-2025 (O & M) ably within a period of eight weeks roduction of this order…”. At the very outset, learned its that the Writ Court order dated 21. complied with by the respondent No. ng a Speaking Order dated 23.10.2025 e said development, the present co ered infructuous and the same may be Ordered accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, uary 05, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 eeks from the date of receipt of arned counsel for the petitioner ted 21.4.2025 (Annexure P-1) has nt No.3 (competent authority) by 0.2025. She submits that in view ent contempt petition has been ay be disposed of as such. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.05 17.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document