HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2807 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A for the State is present. 3. This Court had passed the following order on 22.04.2024:- "Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. By means of this petition, the petitioners have sought quashing of F.I.R. dated 05.04.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0105 of 2024 for the offence under Sections-504,506,366 I.P.C. registered at Police Station-Raniganj, District-Pratapgarh. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner nos.1 and 2 are major and have married with each other by their own free will on 06.04.2024 as per Hindu Rites and Rituals in Arya Samaj, Krishn Nagar, Prayagraj. The copy of the marriage certificate issued by the Arya Samaj Krishn Nagar has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition. In the F.I.R. the age of petitioner no.1 is mentioned as 21 years. In view of the above, he says that no offence under Section 366 I.P.C. is made out. Considering the aforesaid, let notice be issued to opposite party no.4. Let counter affidavit be filed in the matter within four weeks. List this case after four weeks. In view of the above, till the next date of listing, it is provided that petitioners shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case crime number unless and until there is sufficient and credible evidence available against them indicating the commission of offence as alleged Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shravan Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Madhuri Devi And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) in the F.I.R. and/or they are found to have been minors on the date of their marriage. However, petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer as and when they are called to get their statements recorded. Investigating officer shall also take steps for recording of statement of petitioner no.1 before the Magistrate under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, investigation shall be taken to its logical conclusion". 4. As per office report dated 17.05.2025, no steps have been taken. 5. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter. 6. Dismissed accordingly. November 4, 2025 Shahnaz CRLP No. 2807 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench